Wednesday, June 28, 2006

Michael Crichton on environmentalism

It's quite old now... still a great speech by Michael Crichton on the dangers of environmentalism as religion.
http://www.crichton-official.com/speeches/speeches_quote05.html

Wednesday, June 14, 2006

Three girls in my recent life share the same birthday. Discounting sociological mating patterns and zodiacal zygote formations which sway the statistics, the odds of this happening are about 50 million to one.

That's too high odds for the universe to resist. When anything has odds of 50 million to one, you can be pretty sure of it happening right away.

One of the January 19th birthday brigade is a friend. One was a lover and a friend and now just a friend in love with someone else. And one was a fuck and is now nothing to me as I am nothing to her. A pretty selfish fuck, as it happens, but what can you expect from someone who looks like Audrey Hepburn and earns billions of dollars a year?

My agent is annoyed with me. He saw this coming he says. "A lifetime of wisdom can be snuffed out by a cute ass in a red thong," he says.

I chew the lecture. I don't think about red thongs but about January birthdays.

"Love is like life," my agent is yelling at me, almost at breaking point from my recent behaviour. "Love's death is irreversible!" he screams.

I've had this lesson a hundred times. I've even done detention. I've been held back year after year, like no other student ever before me.

It's not I'm lazy. It's not I can't understand.

It's just, when it comes down to it, the lessons go right out the window when the examination begins.

"From first eye contact there's trouble," my agent is yelling down the phone. "Celibacy is the new casual relationship!"

He gets all this from Cosmopolitan.

The trouble with Cosmopolitan magazine is it doesn't tell the truth.

I was once asked to write a few words on love for the UK edition, my girlfriend too, our joint stories to appear as a snippetty column on the page template known in the industry as the "buy more copies because you're in it" feature section.

"Be honest," said the magazine. "We want to hear YOUR experiences."

I wrote the first thing that came to mind.

"I love my girlfriend because she has good prospects and a great ass."

"I first realised I was in love with her when I started writing a book about her," I wrote.

Not one of these words was printed. The simple mud hut of my honest bare emotion was razed by a shitehawk work experience gal, redeveloped as a 1990 supermarket cum day-care centre cum stain on the landscape, rendered vague, massive and wrapped in bubble-wrap, regressing thousands of years into zeroth century Roman architecture to be approved by a bland committee of several million readers.

"You're supposed to be writing about love," screams my agent. "Give them what they want!"

Suddenly I want to be in the magazine.

"I love my girlfriend because she has a beautiful smile," I say.

"MORE! Give me more!" My agent's face becomes a happy mess of thready red veins.

"I first fell in love with my girlfriend when we wandered along the beach hand in hand at sunset."

"PARFAIT!" cries my agent, "We have it! Can you give her a disability?"

"I first fell in love with my girlfriend as I wheeled her across the beach and she complained of the sand in her bearings."

"NON NON NON NON you miss the whole point of l'amour," he says.

"Love is conformity," he screams.

But then he heard about the birthdays.

I told him about January 19th. About the 50 million to one odds.

Five times less likely than winning the Florida state lottery.

My agent hears the word "lottery". He perks up. He wants me to write about birthdays.

"C'est remarkable" he says, "this January 19th."

Yeah I say, but it's no spiritual biggy, I just like to fuck goats.

I mean, a few more hours in the womb, a minor birth complication lasting an hour or two each, they'd all be Aquarians. Who cares, right?

It's not like you'd delay the birth to align the stars.

My agent likes that idea.

He is in the library now researching birth delay drugs, vaginal plugs, giant plungers which suck onto a baby's head and force it backwards, cervical bungs.

"Horoscope horror!" he says. "Babies aborted not for being the wrong sex, but the wrong star sign!"

He loves that sort of stuff.

"Aquarius!" he says. "A new master race of Aquarians! It's good. It has legs."

"Water," he says, "is the bringer of life."

And crabs, I say, are the bringer of crabs.

I think I need a new agent. This post was supposed to be a tribute to a special girl, a friend. Someone a cut above. Someone who sees things differently. Someone good to know.

To that person: enough about goats, agents, cosmo - and instead a hearty and loving *salute* from my tattered soapbox. If I had the funds to drag it up to Chep Lap Kok... to claim it at Heathrow luggage belt 4.... to cram it onto the Piccadilly line, to endure the myriad slowing down, stopping, beeping, doors opening, beeping, doors closing, accelerating, slowing down of the tube repeating itself ad nauseam until Hyde Park Corner where the soapbox has its home..... if I could do that I would.

x

Monday, June 12, 2006

Kidney source "secret area" says Chinese transplant company

Bek Transplant
Click on FAQ, then click on "Do the organs come from alive or dead donors?"

This story originally broke in April when the British Transplantation Society claimed thousands of Chinese organs were being used without consent.

Back then, a foreign ministry official said: "Recently, the Chinese Ministry of Health introduced regulations on this matter. I feel puzzled about why the British organization [BTS] still issued such a report regardless of the fact. I want to remind this organization not to forget what happened in Britain several years ago. It was reported that some hospitals took away the organs of the deceased patients for other purposes, leaving their families totally in the dark. I suggest that you should also remind this organization," he told Chinese journalists.

BTS - consider yourself reminded.

But back to the organ transplants - Bek Transplant says it carries out 270 liver transplants a year using executed prisoners' livers and kidneys. Is this still going on, despite the Chinese government's denials?

Hong Kong Devil spoke to a Bek Transplant employee, who did not wish to be identified and would not give his name.
When asked about the situtaion with the transplant organs coming from executed prisoners wihout their permission, he said: "It has changed now," he said. I asked him where the organs were coming from now. "I don't know. It's a secret area. If I ask the doctors or surgeons, they won't say anything."

That's as much as he would say.

Have the Chinese Ministry of Health regulations come into effect? Are they policing the new rules? Because, at risk of having an organ removed for saying so, it appears nothing has actually been done.

Badger hair imports illegal in China

Just in case your killer China business plan involves badger hair at all, watch out - it is a BANNED import.

Who knew?

Here are the top five banned substances from the Catalogue of Commodities Forbidden to Import (fourth batch) from the Chinese government:

1. unprocessed human hair, no matter washed or not; wasted human hair
2. bristles and wasted bristles
3. badger hair and other wasted animal hair used for making brushes
4. wasted horse hair
5. sugarcane molasses...

the list goes on to include "old clothing" at number 15. Nor does it want any of the world's broken TVs, VCRs or duplicating machines, the kind of old office crap that hawkers make a living from piling up and selling on Queen's Road Central here in HK....

Saturday, June 10, 2006

Beijing Olympics 2008 Swimming Suit design



these may slow the female swimmers down some!

but good for volleyball and the medal ceremonies.

The Wan King Monkey Construction Co., Ltd.

Science news (from a small-business entrepreneur talking to the Wisconsin entrepreneurs Conference):



Near his conclusion, Steven Little told the story of the orb weaver spider and the dwarf goat of Nigeria. Scientists took a gene from the spider that allows it to make the strongest silk fiber in the world and implanted it in the goat. From the milk substance, a prototype vest was made that is stronger than anything on the market.
“My 15-year-old son told me about that,” he said. "My only response was 'Wow.' The world is changing, and you can grow with it."


My only response was: what's in it for the goat? and who needs such a vest?

But such genetic modifications are indeed remarkable. Only last week, Hong Kong Devil chanced upon the story of the Wan King Monkey Construction Company Ltd, based in a small town in Shaanxi Province.

Scientists found, by extracting the genes from the Great Sticky Spider of the aboriginal plains of Australia, and implanting them in a common monkey, the monkey's jizz becomes the strongest setting substance known to man - so much so, in fact, that construction companies such as Wan King Monkey are using genetically modified monkeys to scramble around their building sites and masturbate onto the joints of the bamboo scaffolding, saving many days of manual tying of the joints.

"We just dangle a female monkey from a crane above where we want the scaffolding to go," says the foreman of Shaanxi Crane company, which is in charge of the project.

"During the night, the monkeys pretty much do all of the work, and the scaffolding is complete," added the foreman of Shaanxi Scaffolding company, which is in charge of the project. "There's usually great teamwork from the monkeys in erecting the bamboo to reach the female. Of course we just keep winching her higher."

Wan King Monkey, which is in charge of the project, said the genetically modified monkeys were in no way harmed during the experiments or scaffolding procedure.

"Yes it's true, many of them seem to have their hands stuck to their dicks," said an official.

"But we don't know yet if they're actually stuck, or if they just like walking around like that."

Wednesday, June 07, 2006

Aussie wonders why Beijing is polluted

250,000 motorists joined Beijing's "No-car" event on World Environmental Day, using alternative transport along with the 1,289,000,000 Chinese who don't own cars.

But according to an article in Monsters & Critics, no-car day had little effect and things are as bad as ever in Beijing.

"I drive to work everyday and today was no different", said Melinda Turner, an Australian teacher at an international school. "It took me 20 minutes to cover about two miles - the traffic was as bad as ever. And the pollution was the worst I've seen for weeks."

Quite.

Did she miss the point of no-car day?

Did she think she was exempt?

Was it just for "them"?

What is with people's belief that clean air is some kind of right which should be bestowed upon us? That we somehow deserve it? We're modern. We won't put up with dirty air. Bah to the government. Bah to the utilities, burning all that coal.

Meanwhile the coal plant manager turns up for work rubbing his hands with glee at all of the black stuff he can turn to smoke and ash...

Get real people.

It doesn't work like that.

There is no "they" who's gonna clean up the planet.

It requires individuals to drastically reconsider their energy use.

Not just turning the lights off when you remember. Not just turning down the air conditioning, heating, water heating - these are all tidying measures.

None of these actions, NONE of them, will make the merest difference a year from now when there are an extra 85 million souls on the planet, 85 million living breathing human beings added every year to the world population.

Just their respiring alone will add 2 billion tonnes of CO2 to our atmosphere. And that's before they've produced or consumed ANYTHING but air. That's before they eat any food, construct houses, power their lives. Reproduce themselves.

We may be saving the planet for our grandchildren, but it's them who are going to choke us with their constant in-out respiration at 46 grammes of CO2 exhaled per person per minute as the population grows and grows.

As the air grows heavier and hotter, will they move us to low oxygen old folks homes? In sooty backwaters? Will there be mass euthanasia, funded by selling the "avoided carbon" on the emissions trading markets? One human life cut short by ten years saves 241 tonnes of carbon dioxide from respiration.

"Thanks for leaving us so much coal and so many desolate broken down puny wind turbines, now fuck you," say our grandchildren.

"Thanks for bringing us into a world of seven billion people, but really, thanks most of all for those little green recycling bins. Top effort. NOW GET BACK IN YOUR CARBON HOLE."

They should, really. I wouldn't complain, we've got it coming. We need to reprioritise our carbon dioxide use. Cleaning up our act is one thing. But a total denial about the real cause of our problems is not the way to go.

Hong Kong utility CLP for example has announced its latest "green" campaign; it will plant 30,000 trees here in Hong Kong. It's quite a big deal locally, it will create eight or nine forestry jobs (it should do, unless they're just going to scatter the seeds around then f**k off and leave them for 30 years). It will be very pretty, up in Tai Lam country park and it will help clear the air in the area.

But in terms of CO2 reduction, it is utterly pointless. The trees would be better planted as city shade to reduce air conditioning cost.

At maturity, this many trees will absorb 170 tonnes of CO2 from the atmosphere in a year.

The Hong Kong population will exhale this much carbon dioxide in their breath in 36 seconds.

CLP's Castle Peak power plant will exhale this much carbon dioxide through its stack in 5 minutes.

So really, we're pretty much screwed whatever we do. Tree planting is not going to save us. When the world population reaches 10 billion, we'll need more trees than we have space for. That's when we'll need to start sending tree farms into space, when earth will enjoy rings of orbiting trillion-acre CO2 removal factories.

An electric utility planting 30,000 trees is just a gesture. It's what people who drive to work want to hear, they want the "big bad utility" to do something green like this. They want to get excited about a cause. They want to point the finger at the power generator, the power plant built, approved and paid for by them but owned by the scapegoat entity wrapper we call utilities.

It's easy and it's fun.

Which t-shirt is the rad grad do-gooding greener going to wear: the unrealistic "DEATH TO COAL, PLANT MORE TREES"? The practical "FIX THE FGD UNITS AT 600MW COAL-FIRED POWER PLANTS"?

Or, for the brave, the only real solution to the CO2 problem: "STOP REPRODUCING"?

Malthus was right. He just had the wrong commodity.

Saturday, June 03, 2006

Hong Kong Devil: Wind firm talking it up...

Friday, June 02, 2006

Wind firm talking it up...

http://blueskieschina.com/b2evolution/index.php/2006/06/02/p56
is it fraud or just day dreaming gotten out of control?